REVIEW 2 cited by
The inD Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Road User Trajectories at German Intersections
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automated vehicles rely heavily on data-driven methods, especially for complex urban environments. Large datasets of real world measurement data in the form of road user trajectories are crucial for several tasks like road user prediction models or scenario-based safety validation. So far, though, this demand is unmet as no public dataset of urban road user trajectories is available in an appropriate size, quality and variety. By contrast, the highway drone dataset (highD) has recently shown that drones are an efficient method for acquiring naturalistic road user trajectories. Compared to driving studies or ground-level infrastructure sensors, one major advantage of using a drone is the possibility to record naturalistic behavior, as road users do not notice measurements taking place. Due to the ideal viewing angle, an entire intersection scenario can be measured with significantly less occlusion than with sensors at ground level. Both the class and the trajectory of each road user can be extracted from the video recordings with high precision using state-of-the-art deep neural networks. Therefore, we propose the creation of a comprehensive, large-scale urban intersection dataset with naturalistic road user behavior using camera-equipped drones as successor of the highD dataset. The resulting dataset contains more than 11500 road users including vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians at intersections in Germany and is called inD. The dataset consists of 10 hours of measurement data from four intersections and is available online for non-commercial research at: http://www.inD-dataset.com
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Safety Blind Spot in Remote Driving: Considerations for Risk Assessment of Connection Loss Fallback Strategies
Simulating connection-loss braking on naturalistic urban traffic scenes yields simulated rear-end collision rates of up to 86 percent, suggesting the standard fallback is a SOTIF-relevant hazard.
-
How Roadside Units Enhance Intersection Safety? Cooperative Autonomous Driving System Design and A Proof of Concept
An RSU-centered digital-twin control loop, pre-trained offline and fine-tuned online, coordinates CAVs at intersections and is shown in simulation plus a campus proof-of-concept.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.