Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Trading

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.10107 v1 pith:V5CC6W72 submitted 2019-11-22 q-fin.CP cs.LGq-fin.TR

classification q-fin.CPcs.LGq-fin.TR
keywords algorithmscontinuouscontractsdeepfutureslearningmarketpositions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We adopt Deep Reinforcement Learning algorithms to design trading strategies for continuous futures contracts. Both discrete and continuous action spaces are considered and volatility scaling is incorporated to create reward functions which scale trade positions based on market volatility. We test our algorithms on the 50 most liquid futures contracts from 2011 to 2019, and investigate how performance varies across different asset classes including commodities, equity indices, fixed income and FX markets. We compare our algorithms against classical time series momentum strategies, and show that our method outperforms such baseline models, delivering positive profits despite heavy transaction costs. The experiments show that the proposed algorithms can follow large market trends without changing positions and can also scale down, or hold, through consolidation periods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trading Devil RL: Backdoor attack via Stock market, Bayesian Optimization and Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A data-poisoning backdoor attack on audio transformers is claimed with 100 percent success on TIMIT, but the paper provides no reproducible derivation or evaluation.

Pith tools