Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Correspond Dynamical Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.03015 v3 pith:HA6Z7EWW submitted 2019-12-06 cs.LG cs.ROstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.ROstat.ML
keywords systemsdynamicallatentlearnedcontrolledcorresponddynamicslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many dynamical systems exhibit similar structure, as often captured by hand-designed simplified models that can be used for analysis and control. We develop a method for learning to correspond pairs of dynamical systems via a learned latent dynamical system. Given trajectory data from two dynamical systems, we learn a shared latent state space and a shared latent dynamics model, along with an encoder-decoder pair for each of the original systems. With the learned correspondences in place, we can use a simulation of one system to produce an imagined motion of its counterpart. We can also simulate in the learned latent dynamics and synthesize the motions of both corresponding systems, as a form of bisimulation. We demonstrate the approach using pairs of controlled bipedal walkers, as well as by pairing a walker with a controlled pendulum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Temporal Basis Function Models for Closed-Loop Neural Stimulation

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Temporal basis function models predict the spatiotemporal LFP response to optogenetic stimulation with test-set R2 around 0.46, beating linear state-space and LSTM baselines while training 30 to 100 times faster.

Pith tools