Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Split Learning for collaborative deep learning in healthcare

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.12115 v1 pith:JSDPE3G5 submitted 2019-12-27 cs.LG cs.DCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.DCstat.ML
keywords learningcollaborativedistributeddeepsplitcompareddatahealthcare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Shortage of labeled data has been holding the surge of deep learning in healthcare back, as sample sizes are often small, patient information cannot be shared openly, and multi-center collaborative studies are a burden to set up. Distributed machine learning methods promise to mitigate these problems. We argue for a split learning based approach and apply this distributed learning method for the first time in the medical field to compare performance against (1) centrally hosted and (2) non collaborative configurations for a range of participants. Two medical deep learning tasks are used to compare split learning to conventional single and multi center approaches: a binary classification problem of a data set of 9000 fundus photos, and multi-label classification problem of a data set of 156,535 chest X-rays. The several distributed learning setups are compared for a range of 1-50 distributed participants. Performance of the split learning configuration remained constant for any number of clients compared to a single center study, showing a marked difference compared to the non collaborative configuration after 2 clients (p < 0.001) for both sets. Our results affirm the benefits of collaborative training of deep neural networks in health care. Our work proves the significant benefit of distributed learning in healthcare, and paves the way for future real-world implementations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProtoGuard-SL: Prototype Consistency Based Backdoor Defense for Vertical Split Learning

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Class-prototype consistency vectors plus class-conditional conformal filtering cut backdoor ASR to ~0.03–0.08 on CIFAR-10, SVHN, and Bank Marketing while preserving main accuracy.

  2. HLF-FSL. A Decentralized Federated Split Learning Solution for IoT on Hyperledger Fabric

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HLF-FSL, a Hyperledger Fabric orchestration layer for federated split learning, matches centralized FSL accuracy on CIFAR-10 and MNIST while reducing per-epoch time versus Ethereum-based implementations.

  3. Federated Split Learning with Improved Communication and Storage Efficiency

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CSE-FSL combines an auxiliary network for local updates with periodic smashed-data uploads and a single server-side model, claiming convergence under non-convex loss and lower communication and storage costs.

Pith tools