REVIEW 1 cited by
On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning as represented by the artificial deep neural networks (DNNs) has achieved great success in many important areas that deal with text, images, videos, graphs, and so on. However, the black-box nature of DNNs has become one of the primary obstacles for their wide acceptance in mission-critical applications such as medical diagnosis and therapy. Due to the huge potential of deep learning, interpreting neural networks has recently attracted much research attention. In this paper, based on our comprehensive taxonomy, we systematically review recent studies in understanding the mechanism of neural networks, describe applications of interpretability especially in medicine, and discuss future directions of interpretability research, such as in relation to fuzzy logic and brain science.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Understanding Transformer-based Vision Models through Inversion
A modular, component-wise feature inversion technique applied to DETR and ViT shows that DETR progressively abstracts images into prototypical objects while ViT retains detailed local information.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.