Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

DeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.08113 v1 pith:55IRTDER submitted 2020-01-20 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords featureimageslearningmethodsartificiallybenchmarkdeepfl-iqadistorted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-level deep-features have been driving state-of-the-art methods for aesthetics and image quality assessment (IQA). However, most IQA benchmarks are comprised of artificially distorted images, for which features derived from ImageNet under-perform. We propose a new IQA dataset and a weakly supervised feature learning approach to train features more suitable for IQA of artificially distorted images. The dataset, KADIS-700k, is far more extensive than similar works, consisting of 140,000 pristine images, 25 distortions types, totaling 700k distorted versions. Our weakly supervised feature learning is designed as a multi-task learning type training, using eleven existing full-reference IQA metrics as proxies for differential mean opinion scores. We also introduce a benchmark database, KADID-10k, of artificially degraded images, each subjectively annotated by 30 crowd workers. We make use of our derived image feature vectors for (no-reference) image quality assessment by training and testing a shallow regression network on this database and five other benchmark IQA databases. Our method, termed DeepFL-IQA, performs better than other feature-based no-reference IQA methods and also better than all tested full-reference IQA methods on KADID-10k. For the other five benchmark IQA databases, DeepFL-IQA matches the performance of the best existing end-to-end deep learning-based methods on average.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partial-Reference IQA Based on Hermite-Gauss Structural Prediction and Texture Deviation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    PreSPA predicts perceptual image quality from a single reference scalar and Hermite-Gauss self-prediction of the distorted gradient field, rivaling deep NR models with three affine parameters.

  2. A Reference-Free Framework for Evaluating Single-Frame ISP Pipelines

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A proxy-reference network trained on synthetic camera pipelines estimates PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS without a ground-truth reference, with LoRA fine-tuning adapting it to real pipelines.

  3. HiRQA: Hierarchical Ranking and Quality Alignment for Opinion-Unaware Image Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HiRQA is a self-supervised NR-IQA framework trained on synthetic distortions, using a higher-order ranking loss, embedding distance loss, and text-guided contrastive alignment, claimed to generalize to authentic distortions.

  4. Enhanced Dermatology Image Quality Assessment via Cross-Domain Training

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining natural and dermatology image quality datasets to train a CNN improves dermatology image quality prediction compared with dermatology-only training, but the claimed 'optimal across domains' result is only pa...

  5. A Survey on Image Quality Assessment: Insights, Analysis, and Future Outlook

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of image quality assessment methods that argues for scenario-specific, interpretable, and practical metrics.

Pith tools