Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.10528 v4 pith:DQ5QWMHW submitted 2020-01-28 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords datamislabeledsamplestrainingareaerrormarginmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Not all data in a typical training set help with generalization; some samples can be overly ambiguous or outrightly mislabeled. This paper introduces a new method to identify such samples and mitigate their impact when training neural networks. At the heart of our algorithm is the Area Under the Margin (AUM) statistic, which exploits differences in the training dynamics of clean and mislabeled samples. A simple procedure - adding an extra class populated with purposefully mislabeled threshold samples - learns a AUM upper bound that isolates mislabeled data. This approach consistently improves upon prior work on synthetic and real-world datasets. On the WebVision50 classification task our method removes 17% of training data, yielding a 1.6% (absolute) improvement in test error. On CIFAR100 removing 13% of the data leads to a 1.2% drop in error.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A lightweight score combining prediction mean and variance, plus ratio-adaptive Beta sampling, prunes datasets early in training and reaches 60% ImageNet accuracy at 90% pruning.

Pith tools