Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.01092 v2 pith:NJ2CZP3I submitted 2020-02-04 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords humanapproachdesignhcxaireflectivesociotechnicalsystemsunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explanations--a form of post-hoc interpretability--play an instrumental role in making systems accessible as AI continues to proliferate complex and sensitive sociotechnical systems. In this paper, we introduce Human-centered Explainable AI (HCXAI) as an approach that puts the human at the center of technology design. It develops a holistic understanding of "who" the human is by considering the interplay of values, interpersonal dynamics, and the socially situated nature of AI systems. In particular, we advocate for a reflective sociotechnical approach. We illustrate HCXAI through a case study of an explanation system for non-technical end-users that shows how technical advancements and the understanding of human factors co-evolve. Building on the case study, we lay out open research questions pertaining to further refining our understanding of "who" the human is and extending beyond 1-to-1 human-computer interactions. Finally, we propose that a reflective HCXAI paradigm-mediated through the perspective of Critical Technical Practice and supplemented with strategies from HCI, such as value-sensitive design and participatory design--not only helps us understand our intellectual blind spots, but it can also open up new design and research spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.

  2. What Shapes User Trust in ChatGPT? A Mixed-Methods Study of User Attributes, Trust Dimensions, Task Context, and Societal Perceptions among University Students

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Frequent use, perceived expertise, and ethical risk perceptions predict university students' trust in ChatGPT, while trust varies strongly by task type.

Pith tools