REVIEW 2 cited by
Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Uncertainty estimation and ensembling methods go hand-in-hand. Uncertainty estimation is one of the main benchmarks for assessment of ensembling performance. At the same time, deep learning ensembles have provided state-of-the-art results in uncertainty estimation. In this work, we focus on in-domain uncertainty for image classification. We explore the standards for its quantification and point out pitfalls of existing metrics. Avoiding these pitfalls, we perform a broad study of different ensembling techniques. To provide more insight in this study, we introduce the deep ensemble equivalent score (DEE) and show that many sophisticated ensembling techniques are equivalent to an ensemble of only few independently trained networks in terms of test performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ADVMEM: Adversarial Memory Initialization for Realistic Test-Time Adaptation via Tracklet-Based Benchmarking
A tracklet-based TTA benchmark (ITD) plus ADVMEM, an adversarial memory initialization that substantially improves memory-based methods like SHOT-IM and TENT under temporal dependence.
-
Learning, fast and slow: a two-fold algorithm for data-based model adaptation
Combining control-chart-triggered ensemble expansion with online Gaussian process residual correction lifts FIT from 69.5% to 94.2% on a district heating case.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.