Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Graphs: A Review, A Tool and Empirical Studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.00653 v3 pith:OTH2NJKW submitted 2020-03-02 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords attacksgraphadversarialdefensesdnnsgnnsgraphsstudies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved significant performance in various tasks. However, recent studies have shown that DNNs can be easily fooled by small perturbation on the input, called adversarial attacks. As the extensions of DNNs to graphs, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been demonstrated to inherit this vulnerability. Adversary can mislead GNNs to give wrong predictions by modifying the graph structure such as manipulating a few edges. This vulnerability has arisen tremendous concerns for adapting GNNs in safety-critical applications and has attracted increasing research attention in recent years. Thus, it is necessary and timely to provide a comprehensive overview of existing graph adversarial attacks and the countermeasures. In this survey, we categorize existing attacks and defenses, and review the corresponding state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we have developed a repository with representative algorithms (https://github.com/DSE-MSU/DeepRobust/tree/master/deeprobust/graph). The repository enables us to conduct empirical studies to deepen our understandings on attacks and defenses on graphs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Same Graph Cross-Task Transfer in GNNs: Protocols and Predictors

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a fixed leakage-free protocol, NC→LP transfer reliably helps on homophilic graphs while LP→NC helps mainly when LP is easy and NC is unsaturated; homophily and CoTask Score guide mechanism choice.

  2. Quantifying the Noise of Structural Perturbations on Graph Adversarial Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new link-noise metric, computed from node degrees and entropy-based dissimilarity, ranks candidate adversarial edges and prunes the search space for targeted graph attacks, yielding competitive or better attack succ...

  3. Mitigating the Structural Bias in Graph Adversarial Defenses

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    De2GNN reduces degree bias in adversarial defenses by removing heterophilic links, adding homophilic links to tail nodes, and fusing a kNN feature view through node-wise attention, improving tail-node accuracy under M...

Pith tools