REVIEW 3 cited by
Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The field of defense strategies against adversarial attacks has significantly grown over the last years, but progress is hampered as the evaluation of adversarial defenses is often insufficient and thus gives a wrong impression of robustness. Many promising defenses could be broken later on, making it difficult to identify the state-of-the-art. Frequent pitfalls in the evaluation are improper tuning of hyperparameters of the attacks, gradient obfuscation or masking. In this paper we first propose two extensions of the PGD-attack overcoming failures due to suboptimal step size and problems of the objective function. We then combine our novel attacks with two complementary existing ones to form a parameter-free, computationally affordable and user-independent ensemble of attacks to test adversarial robustness. We apply our ensemble to over 50 models from papers published at recent top machine learning and computer vision venues. In all except one of the cases we achieve lower robust test accuracy than reported in these papers, often by more than $10\%$, identifying several broken defenses.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Securing Multimodal AI through Internal Information Decomposition
A one-class detector using first-token distributional consistency between text-only, vision-only, and joint predictions reduces multimodal jailbreak attack success rates to below 15% with ~2.4% utility loss.
-
Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition
The paper argues that adversarial examples arise from superposition, and shows that changing superposition changes robustness and vice versa in toy models and ResNet18.
-
HEM: a margin-based loss for visual categorisation tasks
A new margin-based loss, HEM, trains image classifiers that are more robust to unknown and adversarial inputs and better at continual learning and segmentation than cross-entropy-trained models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.