Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.01897 v2 pith:QYEAEV55 submitted 2020-03-04 cs.LG cs.NEmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification cs.LGcs.NEmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords regularizationsizedescentdoubletestalgorithmslinearmitigate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent empirical and theoretical studies have shown that many learning algorithms -- from linear regression to neural networks -- can have test performance that is non-monotonic in quantities such the sample size and model size. This striking phenomenon, often referred to as "double descent", has raised questions of if we need to re-think our current understanding of generalization. In this work, we study whether the double-descent phenomenon can be avoided by using optimal regularization. Theoretically, we prove that for certain linear regression models with isotropic data distribution, optimally-tuned $\ell_2$ regularization achieves monotonic test performance as we grow either the sample size or the model size. We also demonstrate empirically that optimally-tuned $\ell_2$ regularization can mitigate double descent for more general models, including neural networks. Our results suggest that it may also be informative to study the test risk scalings of various algorithms in the context of appropriately tuned regularization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 48 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Domain Adaptation of Mismatched Proximal Denoiser for Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For PnP-PGD, residual reconstruction error is bounded by average squared mismatch between the deployed denoiser and the target proximal map, motivating proximal-matching few-shot adaptation that outperforms MSE adapta...

  2. Quantifying the Prediction Uncertainty of Machine Learning Models for Individual Data

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A per-sample confidence score derived from the pNML min-max regret is applied to linear regression and neural networks, and improves OOD detection, adversarial robustness, and active learning.

Pith tools