REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descent
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recent empirical and theoretical studies have shown that many learning algorithms -- from linear regression to neural networks -- can have test performance that is non-monotonic in quantities such the sample size and model size. This striking phenomenon, often referred to as "double descent", has raised questions of if we need to re-think our current understanding of generalization. In this work, we study whether the double-descent phenomenon can be avoided by using optimal regularization. Theoretically, we prove that for certain linear regression models with isotropic data distribution, optimally-tuned $\ell_2$ regularization achieves monotonic test performance as we grow either the sample size or the model size. We also demonstrate empirically that optimally-tuned $\ell_2$ regularization can mitigate double descent for more general models, including neural networks. Our results suggest that it may also be informative to study the test risk scalings of various algorithms in the context of appropriately tuned regularization.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Domain Adaptation of Mismatched Proximal Denoiser for Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction
For PnP-PGD, residual reconstruction error is bounded by average squared mismatch between the deployed denoiser and the target proximal map, motivating proximal-matching few-shot adaptation that outperforms MSE adapta...
-
Quantifying the Prediction Uncertainty of Machine Learning Models for Individual Data
A per-sample confidence score derived from the pNML min-max regret is applied to linear regression and neural networks, and improves OOD detection, adversarial robustness, and active learning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.