Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07347 v3 pith:NXCDMSHF submitted 2020-04-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords informationheterogeneoushybridqamodelquestionansweringhybridtable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing question answering datasets focus on dealing with homogeneous information, based either only on text or KB/Table information alone. However, as human knowledge is distributed over heterogeneous forms, using homogeneous information alone might lead to severe coverage problems. To fill in the gap, we present HybridQA https://github.com/wenhuchen/HybridQA, a new large-scale question-answering dataset that requires reasoning on heterogeneous information. Each question is aligned with a Wikipedia table and multiple free-form corpora linked with the entities in the table. The questions are designed to aggregate both tabular information and text information, i.e., lack of either form would render the question unanswerable. We test with three different models: 1) a table-only model. 2) text-only model. 3) a hybrid model that combines heterogeneous information to find the answer. The experimental results show that the EM scores obtained by two baselines are below 20\%, while the hybrid model can achieve an EM over 40\%. This gap suggests the necessity to aggregate heterogeneous information in HybridQA. However, the hybrid model's score is still far behind human performance. Hence, HybridQA can serve as a challenging benchmark to study question answering with heterogeneous information.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CF-RAG: A Dataset and Method for Carbon Footprint QA Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned Llama 3 model with a trained document critic and program-based reasoning beats GPT-4o and other baselines on a new carbon footprint QA benchmark.

  2. SciCUEval: A Comprehensive Dataset for Evaluating Scientific Context Understanding in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SciCUEval provides a multi-domain, multi-modality benchmark for LLM scientific context understanding, and evaluation results show reasoning-augmented models outperform specialized scientific models, but the dataset is...

  3. Adaptive Graph of Thoughts: Test-Time Adaptive Reasoning Unifying Chain, Tree, and Graph Structures

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AGoT is a recursive graph-based prompting framework that decomposes LLM queries into nested subgraphs and reports large relative gains on some benchmarks, though headline GPQA gains rely on a shuffled subset.

Pith tools