Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Study on the Challenges of Using Robotics Simulators for Testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07368 v1 pith:QNX62IVY submitted 2020-04-15 cs.RO cs.SE

classification cs.ROcs.SE
keywords simulationtestingchallengesdevelopmentroboticssimulatorsautomateddevelopers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Robotics simulation plays an important role in the design, development, and verification and validation of robotic systems. Recent studies have shown that simulation may be used as a cheaper, safer, and more reliable alternative to manual, and widely used, process of field testing. This is particularly important in the context of continuous integration pipelines, where integrated automated testing is key to reducing costs while maintaining system safety. However, simulation and automated testing are not seeing the degree of widespread adoption in practice that their potential would motivate. Our goal in this paper is to develop a principled understanding of the ways developers use simulation in their process, and the challenges they face in doing so. This type of understanding can guide the development of more effective simulators and testing techniques for modern robotics development. To that end, we conduct a survey of 82 robotics developers from a diversity of backgrounds that addresses the current capabilities and limits of simulation technology in practice. We find that simulation is used by 85% of our participants for testing, and that many participants desire to use simulation as part of their test automation. We identify 10 high-level challenges that impede developers from using simulation for manual and automated testing, and general purposes. These challenges include the gap between simulation and reality, a lack of reproducibility, and considerable resource costs associated with using simulators. Finally, we outline avenues for improvement in the development of new simulators that can help simulation reach its potential as a means of verification and validation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sari Sandbox: A Virtual Retail Store Environment for Embodied AI Agents

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A photorealistic Unity-based retail store environment with 250 items, a Python API, and a VR human-demonstration benchmark for embodied AI shopping agents.

  2. Learning to Evaluate Autonomous Behaviour in Human-Robot Interaction

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural behavior classifier trained on teleoperated joint trajectories is proposed and tested as an offline meta-evaluator for imitation learning policies in human-robot interaction.

Pith tools