REVIEW 2 cited by
Non-Autoregressive Image Captioning with Counterfactuals-Critical Multi-Agent Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Most image captioning models are autoregressive, i.e. they generate each word by conditioning on previously generated words, which leads to heavy latency during inference. Recently, non-autoregressive decoding has been proposed in machine translation to speed up the inference time by generating all words in parallel. Typically, these models use the word-level cross-entropy loss to optimize each word independently. However, such a learning process fails to consider the sentence-level consistency, thus resulting in inferior generation quality of these non-autoregressive models. In this paper, we propose a Non-Autoregressive Image Captioning (NAIC) model with a novel training paradigm: Counterfactuals-critical Multi-Agent Learning (CMAL). CMAL formulates NAIC as a multi-agent reinforcement learning system where positions in the target sequence are viewed as agents that learn to cooperatively maximize a sentence-level reward. Besides, we propose to utilize massive unlabeled images to boost captioning performance. Extensive experiments on MSCOCO image captioning benchmark show that our NAIC model achieves a performance comparable to state-of-the-art autoregressive models, while brings 13.9x decoding speedup.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Flowing from Words to Pixels: A Noise-Free Framework for Cross-Modality Evolution
CrossFlow turns text directly into images, and images into text, depth, and higher resolution, by flowing between modality latents without a noise prior or cross-attention.
-
A Review of Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Past, Present and Future
A historical review that organizes multimodal explainability methods into four chronological eras and three explainability types, extending coverage to generative LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.