REVIEW 3 cited by
Envy-free Relaxations for Goods, Chores, and Mixed Items
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In fair division problems, we are given a set $S$ of $m$ items and a set $N$ of $n$ agents with individual preferences, and the goal is to find an allocation of items among agents so that each agent finds the allocation fair. There are several established fairness concepts and envy-freeness is one of the most extensively studied ones. However envy-free allocations do not always exist when items are indivisible and this has motivated relaxations of envy-freeness: envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) and envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) are two well-studied relaxations. We consider the problem of finding EF1 and EFX allocations for utility functions that are not necessarily monotone, and propose four possible extensions of different strength to this setting. In particular, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for finding an EF1 allocation for two agents with arbitrary utility functions. An example is given showing that EFX allocations need not exist for two agents with non-monotone, non-additive, identical utility functions. However, when all agents have monotone (not necessarily additive) identical utility functions, we prove that an EFX allocation of chores always exists. As a step toward understanding the general case, we discuss two subclasses of utility functions: Boolean utilities that are $\{0,+1\}$-valued functions, and negative Boolean utilities that are $\{0,-1\}$-valued functions. For the latter, we give a polynomial time algorithm that finds an EFX allocation when the utility functions are identical.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
To EFX OR to MMS, That is the Question
EFX∨MMS allocations can fail for three agents with submodular goods (8 items) or chores (7 items), but always exist for additive mixed items with at most three valuation types when one type is a singleton.
-
From Cake-Cutting and Necklace-Splitting to Fair Division of Indivisible Items
A transfer framework converts continuous cake-cutting and necklace-splitting theorems into EFk-type guarantees for indivisible items on a path, yielding new existence results for connected EF1cg allocations and consen...
-
A Better-than-$e^{1/e}$ Approximation Algorithm for Nash Social Welfare under Additive Valuations
An efficient randomized algorithm approximates max Nash social welfare under additive valuations by e^{1/e} - c for some c > 0 — the first improvement over the 2018 bound of Barman et al.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.