Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Federated Semi-Supervised Learning with Inter-Client Consistency & Disjoint Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.12097 v3 pith:43ZNBYQU submitted 2020-06-22 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningdatafederatedlabeledsemi-supervisedavailablefedmatchmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While existing federated learning approaches mostly require that clients have fully-labeled data to train on, in realistic settings, data obtained at the client-side often comes without any accompanying labels. Such deficiency of labels may result from either high labeling cost, or difficulty of annotation due to the requirement of expert knowledge. Thus the private data at each client may be either partly labeled, or completely unlabeled with labeled data being available only at the server, which leads us to a new practical federated learning problem, namely Federated Semi-Supervised Learning (FSSL). In this work, we study two essential scenarios of FSSL based on the location of the labeled data. The first scenario considers a conventional case where clients have both labeled and unlabeled data (labels-at-client), and the second scenario considers a more challenging case, where the labeled data is only available at the server (labels-at-server). We then propose a novel method to tackle the problems, which we refer to as Federated Matching (FedMatch). FedMatch improves upon naive combinations of federated learning and semi-supervised learning approaches with a new inter-client consistency loss and decomposition of the parameters for disjoint learning on labeled and unlabeled data. Through extensive experimental validation of our method in the two different scenarios, we show that our method outperforms both local semi-supervised learning and baselines which naively combine federated learning with semi-supervised learning. The code is available at https://github.com/wyjeong/FedMatch.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey on Federated Learning in Human Sensing

    cs.LG 2025-01 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper reviews 211 federated learning studies across six human sensing domains, assesses them along eight dimensions, and identifies five areas needing urgent research.

  2. Diffusion Model-Based Data Synthesis Aided Federated Semi-Supervised Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In federated learning with very few labels, a collaboratively trained diffusion model can synthesize balanced examples for missing classes and lift accuracy by about 14 points on CIFAR-10.

  3. Unified Alignment Protocol: Making Sense of the Unlabeled Data in New Domains

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UAP, an alternating two-stage training protocol, improves unseen-domain accuracy in semi-supervised federated learning by aligning client and server features to a Gaussian distribution defined by the classifier weights.

  4. Federated Learning with Workload Reduction through Partial Training of Client Models and Entropy-Based Data Selection

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Selecting the local examples a model is least confident about, and training only part of the model, lets federated learning use far less client data and compute while keeping or improving accuracy.

Pith tools