Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Methodology for Creating AI FactSheets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.13796 v2 pith:ZFDSION7 submitted 2020-06-24 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords methodologydocumentationcreatingfactsheetsmodelscreatedescribeservices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI models and services are used in a growing number of highstakes areas, a consensus is forming around the need for a clearer record of how these models and services are developed to increase trust. Several proposals for higher quality and more consistent AI documentation have emerged to address ethical and legal concerns and general social impacts of such systems. However, there is little published work on how to create this documentation. This is the first work to describe a methodology for creating the form of AI documentation we call FactSheets. We have used this methodology to create useful FactSheets for nearly two dozen models. This paper describes this methodology and shares the insights we have gathered. Within each step of the methodology, we describe the issues to consider and the questions to explore with the relevant people in an organization who will be creating and consuming the AI facts in a FactSheet. This methodology will accelerate the broader adoption of transparent AI documentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Completeness of Datasets Documentation on ML/AI repositories: an Empirical Investigation

    cs.DL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Most popular ML/AI datasets are poorly documented, especially regarding collection, processing, and maintenance, according to a manual audit of 100 datasets across four repositories.

  2. Regulating Multifunctionality

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Management-based regulation, which requires developers to create internal risk-management plans, is the most viable response to multifunctional AI because prescriptive rules, performance standards, and liability are e...

Pith tools