Pith. sign in

REVIEW

INT: An Inequality Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization in Theorem Proving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.02924 v2 pith:RBGTRZST submitted 2020-07-06 cs.AI cs.LGcs.LOstat.ML

classification cs.AIcs.LGcs.LOstat.ML
keywords provingtheoremgeneralizationbenchmarktheoremsagentsevaluateinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In learning-assisted theorem proving, one of the most critical challenges is to generalize to theorems unlike those seen at training time. In this paper, we introduce INT, an INequality Theorem proving benchmark, specifically designed to test agents' generalization ability. INT is based on a procedure for generating theorems and proofs; this procedure's knobs allow us to measure 6 different types of generalization, each reflecting a distinct challenge characteristic to automated theorem proving. In addition, unlike prior benchmarks for learning-assisted theorem proving, INT provides a lightweight and user-friendly theorem proving environment with fast simulations, conducive to performing learning-based and search-based research. We introduce learning-based baselines and evaluate them across 6 dimensions of generalization with the benchmark. We then evaluate the same agents augmented with Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) at test time, and show that MCTS can help to prove new theorems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools