Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Reinforcement Learning and its Neuroscientific Implications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.03750 v1 pith:2BSJL346 submitted 2020-07-07 cs.AI cs.LGq-bio.NC

classification cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.NC
keywords deepresearchlearningimplicationsbrainneuroscienceneuroscientificreinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of powerful artificial intelligence is defining new research directions in neuroscience. To date, this research has focused largely on deep neural networks trained using supervised learning, in tasks such as image classification. However, there is another area of recent AI work which has so far received less attention from neuroscientists, but which may have profound neuroscientific implications: deep reinforcement learning. Deep RL offers a comprehensive framework for studying the interplay among learning, representation and decision-making, offering to the brain sciences a new set of research tools and a wide range of novel hypotheses. In the present review, we provide a high-level introduction to deep RL, discuss some of its initial applications to neuroscience, and survey its wider implications for research on brain and behavior, concluding with a list of opportunities for next-stage research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combining Bayesian Inference and Reinforcement Learning for Agent Decision Making: A Review

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes combinations of Bayesian inference and reinforcement learning, rates them on four properties, and raises ten open questions.

Pith tools