Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06622 v3 pith:PTNUP2H2 submitted 2020-07-13 cs.CR cs.LGcs.SD

classification cs.CRcs.LGcs.SD
keywords systemsattacksspeakerspeechdemonstraterecognitionspaceinputs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Speech and speaker recognition systems are employed in a variety of applications, from personal assistants to telephony surveillance and biometric authentication. The wide deployment of these systems has been made possible by the improved accuracy in neural networks. Like other systems based on neural networks, recent research has demonstrated that speech and speaker recognition systems are vulnerable to attacks using manipulated inputs. However, as we demonstrate in this paper, the end-to-end architecture of speech and speaker systems and the nature of their inputs make attacks and defenses against them substantially different than those in the image space. We demonstrate this first by systematizing existing research in this space and providing a taxonomy through which the community can evaluate future work. We then demonstrate experimentally that attacks against these models almost universally fail to transfer. In so doing, we argue that substantial additional work is required to provide adequate mitigations in this space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal Adversarial Audio Perturbations

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Universal adversarial audio perturbations, found by a penalty-based optimizer, misclassify over 85% of test sounds across several 1D CNN audio classifiers, in both targeted and untargeted settings.

Pith tools