REVIEW 2 cited by
DyNODE: Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Dynamics Modeling in Continuous Control
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a novel approach (DyNODE) that captures the underlying dynamics of a system by incorporating control in a neural ordinary differential equation framework. We conduct a systematic evaluation and comparison of our method and standard neural network architectures for dynamics modeling. Our results indicate that a simple DyNODE architecture when combined with an actor-critic reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that uses model predictions to improve the critic's target values, outperforms canonical neural networks, both in sample efficiency and predictive performance across a diverse range of continuous tasks that are frequently used to benchmark RL algorithms. This approach provides a new avenue for the development of models that are more suited to learn the evolution of dynamical systems, particularly useful in the context of model-based reinforcement learning. To assist related work, we have made code available at https://github.com/vmartinezalvarez/DyNODE .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Flowing Through States: Neural ODE Regularization for Reinforcement Learning
FlowReg adds a neural ODE alignment loss to actor-critic training, producing smoother latent trajectories and higher reported rewards on 11 Atari and 3 Minigrid environments.
-
A Minimal Interpretable Architecture for Zero-Shot Reconstruction of Dynamical Systems
A two-parameter nearest-neighbor recurrence, DynaBase, matches large foundation models at zero-shot dynamical-system reconstruction and unifies context parroting with chaotic dynamics as two ends of one parameter.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.