Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Inter-database validation of a deep learning approach for automatic sleep scoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.10365 v1 pith:N737GXEA submitted 2020-09-22 cs.LG cs.PFeess.SPstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.PFeess.SPstat.ML
keywords sleepstagingapproachautomaticgeneralizationperformancevalidationcapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work we describe a new deep learning approach for automatic sleep staging, and carry out its validation by addressing its generalization capabilities on a wide range of sleep staging databases. Prediction capabilities are evaluated in the context of independent local and external generalization scenarios. Effectively, by comparing both procedures it is possible to better extrapolate the expected performance of the method on the general reference task of sleep staging, regardless of data from a specific database. In addition, we examine the suitability of a novel approach based on the use of an ensemble of individual local models and evaluate its impact on the resulting inter-database generalization performance. Validation results show good general performance, as compared to the expected levels of human expert agreement, as well as state-of-the-art automatic sleep staging approaches

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BrainBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Comprehensive EEG Understanding

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark of 172 EEG analysis tasks shows that LLMs handle well-specified analyses better than long multi-step workflows, and that structured agent execution usually beats autonomous code generation.

Pith tools