Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Interpreting Graph Neural Networks for NLP With Differentiable Edge Masking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00577 v3 pith:SZIZZNIL submitted 2020-10-01 cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.LGstat.ML
keywords interpretingedgeedgesmodelmodelsclassifierdifferentiableevery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a popular approach to integrating structural inductive biases into NLP models. However, there has been little work on interpreting them, and specifically on understanding which parts of the graphs (e.g. syntactic trees or co-reference structures) contribute to a prediction. In this work, we introduce a post-hoc method for interpreting the predictions of GNNs which identifies unnecessary edges. Given a trained GNN model, we learn a simple classifier that, for every edge in every layer, predicts if that edge can be dropped. We demonstrate that such a classifier can be trained in a fully differentiable fashion, employing stochastic gates and encouraging sparsity through the expected $L_0$ norm. We use our technique as an attribution method to analyze GNN models for two tasks -- question answering and semantic role labeling -- providing insights into the information flow in these models. We show that we can drop a large proportion of edges without deteriorating the performance of the model, while we can analyse the remaining edges for interpreting model predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Explanations Increase the Risk of Decision Logic Leakage? Explanation-Guided Stealing of Graph Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An attacker can exploit explanation heatmaps from deployed graph neural networks to train a surrogate that matches both predictions and highlighted decision logic, outperforming prior stealing attacks.

  2. Towards Faithful Graph Explanations with Synergistic Edge Effects via Granular Balls

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SeeExplainer explains GNN predictions by decomposing graphs into granular balls and selecting substructures whose removal changes predictions, but its reported stability and fidelity advantages are largely definitiona...

  3. Graph Neural Networks in Modern AI-aided Drug Discovery

    q-bio.BM 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A comprehensive model-centric review of graph neural network methods and applications in AI-aided drug discovery, from molecular representation to synthesis planning.

Pith tools