REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Masks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Masks
read the original abstract
Neural networks (NNs) whose subnetworks implement reusable functions are expected to offer numerous advantages, including compositionality through efficient recombination of functional building blocks, interpretability, preventing catastrophic interference, etc. Understanding if and how NNs are modular could provide insights into how to improve them. Current inspection methods, however, fail to link modules to their functionality. In this paper, we present a novel method based on learning binary weight masks to identify individual weights and subnets responsible for specific functions. Using this powerful tool, we contribute an extensive study of emerging modularity in NNs that covers several standard architectures and datasets. We demonstrate how common NNs fail to reuse submodules and offer new insights into the related issue of systematic generalization on language tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Indirect Object Identification to Syllogisms: Exploring Binary Mechanisms in Transformer Circuits
GPT-2 small performs syllogisms through truth-copying attention heads and a suppression-plus-MLP pathway that can output a negated truth value.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.