Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Open Question Answering over Tables and Text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.10439 v2 pith:HFOMXDXM submitted 2020-10-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords questionopenevidenceansweringott-qaretrievingtabulartext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In open question answering (QA), the answer to a question is produced by retrieving and then analyzing documents that might contain answers to the question. Most open QA systems have considered only retrieving information from unstructured text. Here we consider for the first time open QA over both tabular and textual data and present a new large-scale dataset Open Table-and-Text Question Answering (OTT-QA) to evaluate performance on this task. Most questions in OTT-QA require multi-hop inference across tabular data and unstructured text, and the evidence required to answer a question can be distributed in different ways over these two types of input, making evidence retrieval challenging -- our baseline model using an iterative retriever and BERT-based reader achieves an exact match score less than 10%. We then propose two novel techniques to address the challenge of retrieving and aggregating evidence for OTT-QA. The first technique is to use "early fusion" to group multiple highly relevant tabular and textual units into a fused block, which provides more context for the retriever to search for. The second technique is to use a cross-block reader to model the cross-dependency between multiple retrieved evidence with global-local sparse attention. Combining these two techniques improves the score significantly, to above 27%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HETERQA: Benchmarking Record Retrieval over Multiple Heterogeneous Sources

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    HETERQA builds 857 answer-driven multi-source Yelp record-retrieval questions and finds hybrid and agentic methods still far from saturating Recall@10 and MRR@10.

  2. Table Understanding and (Multimodal) LLMs: A Cross-Domain Case Study on Scientific vs. Non-Scientific Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, TableEval, with 3017 tables in five formats, shows LLMs are robust to table representation but perform worse on scientific tables, with the caveat that the domain gap is confounded by task difficulty.

  3. WikiMixQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Question Answering over Tables and Charts

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WikiMixQA is a new 1,000-question benchmark for cross-modal table-and-chart reasoning, on which proprietary models drop from ~70% to ~55% accuracy when full Wikipedia pages are provided.

  4. Multimodal Tabular Reasoning with Privileged Structured Information

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An 8B multimodal LLM trained on 9k reasoning traces distilled from structured tables reaches state-of-the-art open-source accuracy on table-image question answering and fact verification.

Pith tools