Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Determining Question-Answer Plausibility in Crowdsourced Datasets Using Multi-Task Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.04883 v1 pith:5D725HLU submitted 2020-11-10 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords plausibilityresponsequestionquestion-answerdatasetssocialanswerauroc
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Datasets extracted from social networks and online forums are often prone to the pitfalls of natural language, namely the presence of unstructured and noisy data. In this work, we seek to enable the collection of high-quality question-answer datasets from social media by proposing a novel task for automated quality analysis and data cleaning: question-answer (QA) plausibility. Given a machine or user-generated question and a crowd-sourced response from a social media user, we determine if the question and response are valid; if so, we identify the answer within the free-form response. We design BERT-based models to perform the QA plausibility task, and we evaluate the ability of our models to generate a clean, usable question-answer dataset. Our highest-performing approach consists of a single-task model which determines the plausibility of the question, followed by a multi-task model which evaluates the plausibility of the response as well as extracts answers (Question Plausibility AUROC=0.75, Response Plausibility AUROC=0.78, Answer Extraction F1=0.665).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Surfacing variations across multiple MLLM image descriptions increases blind and low vision users' detection of unreliable claims and reduces their over-trust in a single AI description.

Pith tools