REVIEW 5 cited by
Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Design
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A wide range of reinforcement learning (RL) problems - including robustness, transfer learning, unsupervised RL, and emergent complexity - require specifying a distribution of tasks or environments in which a policy will be trained. However, creating a useful distribution of environments is error prone, and takes a significant amount of developer time and effort. We propose Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) as an alternative paradigm, where developers provide environments with unknown parameters, and these parameters are used to automatically produce a distribution over valid, solvable environments. Existing approaches to automatically generating environments suffer from common failure modes: domain randomization cannot generate structure or adapt the difficulty of the environment to the agent's learning progress, and minimax adversarial training leads to worst-case environments that are often unsolvable. To generate structured, solvable environments for our protagonist agent, we introduce a second, antagonist agent that is allied with the environment-generating adversary. The adversary is motivated to generate environments which maximize regret, defined as the difference between the protagonist and antagonist agent's return. We call our technique Protagonist Antagonist Induced Regret Environment Design (PAIRED). Our experiments demonstrate that PAIRED produces a natural curriculum of increasingly complex environments, and PAIRED agents achieve higher zero-shot transfer performance when tested in highly novel environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Self-Modifying Lean Proof Agents with Verifier-Grounded Benchmark Coevolution
A verifier-grounded self-evolving Lean proof agent with a champion-driven, self-hardening benchmark reached 45.1% held-out miniF2F solve rate versus 32.0% for a fixed-benchmark baseline.
-
How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?
A systematic comparison of black-box evolution, neural and symbolic distillation, and LLM-based proposal for meta-learning RL algorithms yields practical recommendations: warm-started LLM proposal is sample-efficient,...
-
LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback
LEMUR jointly learns a separate reward model for each teacher's preferences and uses them to train a population of multi-objective policies, beating baselines that merge feedback into one reward.
-
Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR
Gated synthetic augmentations of a 10-task human base substitute for ~87 extra human RLVR tasks on aggregate held-out pass@1, with cost-adjusted trade rate ρ_cost in [1.4×, 11.6×].
-
GACL: Grounded Adaptive Curriculum Learning with Active Task and Performance Monitoring
GACL adds domain grounding via alternating reference and synthetic task sampling to a VAE-based regret-driven curriculum teacher, reporting higher success rates than CLUTR on BARN navigation and quadruped locomotion i...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.