REVIEW 6 cited by
Stellar-mass microlensing of gravitational waves
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
When gravitational waves pass through the nuclear star clusters of galactic lenses, they may be microlensed by the stars. Such microlensing can cause potentially observable beating patterns on the waveform due to waveform superposition and magnify the signal. On the one hand, the beating patterns and magnification could lead to the first detection of a microlensed gravitational wave. On the other hand, microlensing introduces a systematic error in strong lensing use-cases, such as localization and cosmography studies. We show that diffraction effects are important when we consider GWs in the LIGO frequency band lensed by objects with masses $\lesssim 100 \, \rm M_\odot$. We also show that the galaxy hosting the microlenses changes the lensing configuration qualitatively, so we cannot treat the microlenses as isolated point mass lenses when strong lensing is involved. We find that for stellar lenses with masses $\sim 1 \, \rm M_\odot$, diffraction effects significantly suppress the microlensing magnification. Thus, our results suggest that gravitational waves lensed by typical galaxy or galaxy cluster lenses may offer a relatively clean environment to study the lens system, free of contamination by stellar lenses. We discuss potential implications for the strong lensing science case. More complicated microlensing configurations will require further study.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
The diffraction-lensing interpretation of GW231123 with astrophysical priors
GW231123 is better fit by a lower-mass merger diffracted by an isolated ~1000 M_sun lens, but astrophysical priors and a frequentist rate estimate make this lensing interpretation unlikely.
-
Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning
Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.
-
Across the Universe: GW231123 as a magnified and diffracted black hole merger
GW231123's extreme mass and spins may be explained by a point-mass microlens embedded in a galaxy, reducing the inferred source mass to about 100-180 solar masses.
-
Identifying Microlensing by Compact Dark Matter through Diffraction Patterns in Gravitational Waves with Machine Learning
A wavelet-convolution neural network distinguishes simulated lensed from unlensed gravitational waves with 92.2% accuracy (AUC 0.965) using wave-optics diffraction patterns.
-
Accelerated inference of microlensed gravitational waves with machine learning
A neural posterior estimator trained on wave-optics-microlensed gravitational-wave signals recovers source and lens parameters and Bayes factors consistent with Bilby, about 10 times faster.
-
Parameter estimation of microlensed gravitational waves with Conditional Variational Autoencoders
A conditional variational autoencoder trained on simulated microlensed binary black hole signals estimates lens mass and source offset with well-calibrated posteriors, runs about 10,000 times faster than Bilby, and cu...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.