Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SEED: Self-supervised Distillation For Visual Representation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.04731 v2 pith:M5ENS6RS submitted 2021-01-12 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords self-supervisedlearningseedsmalldistillationmodelsproblemstudent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with self-supervised learning for small models. The problem is motivated by our empirical studies that while the widely used contrastive self-supervised learning method has shown great progress on large model training, it does not work well for small models. To address this problem, we propose a new learning paradigm, named SElf-SupErvised Distillation (SEED), where we leverage a larger network (as Teacher) to transfer its representational knowledge into a smaller architecture (as Student) in a self-supervised fashion. Instead of directly learning from unlabeled data, we train a student encoder to mimic the similarity score distribution inferred by a teacher over a set of instances. We show that SEED dramatically boosts the performance of small networks on downstream tasks. Compared with self-supervised baselines, SEED improves the top-1 accuracy from 42.2% to 67.6% on EfficientNet-B0 and from 36.3% to 68.2% on MobileNet-v3-Large on the ImageNet-1k dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey on Data Curation for Visual Contrastive Learning: Why Crafting Effective Positive and Negative Pairs Matters

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes positive and negative pair curation techniques in visual contrastive learning and discusses their trade-offs and open questions.

Pith tools