Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.05974 v5 pith:25TXQIY2 submitted 2021-01-15 cs.LG cs.SIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.SIstat.ML
keywords networkstemporalcawsinductivelawsnetworkwalkscaw-n
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Temporal networks serve as abstractions of many real-world dynamic systems. These networks typically evolve according to certain laws, such as the law of triadic closure, which is universal in social networks. Inductive representation learning of temporal networks should be able to capture such laws and further be applied to systems that follow the same laws but have not been unseen during the training stage. Previous works in this area depend on either network node identities or rich edge attributes and typically fail to extract these laws. Here, we propose Causal Anonymous Walks (CAWs) to inductively represent a temporal network. CAWs are extracted by temporal random walks and work as automatic retrieval of temporal network motifs to represent network dynamics while avoiding the time-consuming selection and counting of those motifs. CAWs adopt a novel anonymization strategy that replaces node identities with the hitting counts of the nodes based on a set of sampled walks to keep the method inductive, and simultaneously establish the correlation between motifs. We further propose a neural-network model CAW-N to encode CAWs, and pair it with a CAW sampling strategy with constant memory and time cost to support online training and inference. CAW-N is evaluated to predict links over 6 real temporal networks and uniformly outperforms previous SOTA methods by averaged 10% AUC gain in the inductive setting. CAW-N also outperforms previous methods in 4 out of the 6 networks in the transductive setting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DyGnROLE: Asymmetric Pretraining for Edge Classification on Dynamic Graphs

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Role-disentangled Transformer plus temporal contrastive pretraining improves future edge classification with 10k labels on 7 of 8 DTGB datasets.

  2. When Speed meets Accuracy: an Efficient and Effective Graph Model for Temporal Link Prediction

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EAGLE predicts temporal links with top-k recent neighbors plus top-k shared temporal PageRank influencers, matching or beating transformer T-GNNs while running far faster.

  3. Scalable and Efficient Joint Spiking Embedding Predictive Architecture for Large-Scale Dynamic Graphs

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SG-JEPA applies joint-embedding predictive learning to dynamic graphs, using spiking-neuron context encoders to predict future node embeddings without edge reconstruction or graph augmentation.

  4. A2QTGN: Adaptive Amplitude Quantum-Integrated Temporal Graph Network for Dynamic Link Prediction

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid quantum-classical temporal graph network with adaptive amplitude encoding claims strong link-prediction results on five TGBL benchmarks, but the evaluation is undermined by a below-random baseline and missing code.

  5. Higher-order Structure Boosts Link Prediction on Temporal Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    HTGN adds hyperedge memory and hypergraph convolution to temporal GNNs, claiming better dynamic link prediction and lower memory cost, but the reported results are undermined by data inconsistencies and invalid proofs.

Pith tools