Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09671 v3 pith:3MZ5XWKL submitted 2021-01-24 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords networkpruningquantizationaccuracycompressionnetworksneuralcompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have been applied in many applications exhibiting extraordinary abilities in the field of computer vision. However, complex network architectures challenge efficient real-time deployment and require significant computation resources and energy costs. These challenges can be overcome through optimizations such as network compression. Network compression can often be realized with little loss of accuracy. In some cases accuracy may even improve. This paper provides a survey on two types of network compression: pruning and quantization. Pruning can be categorized as static if it is performed offline or dynamic if it is performed at run-time. We compare pruning techniques and describe criteria used to remove redundant computations. We discuss trade-offs in element-wise, channel-wise, shape-wise, filter-wise, layer-wise and even network-wise pruning. Quantization reduces computations by reducing the precision of the datatype. Weights, biases, and activations may be quantized typically to 8-bit integers although lower bit width implementations are also discussed including binary neural networks. Both pruning and quantization can be used independently or combined. We compare current techniques, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, present compressed network accuracy results on a number of frameworks, and provide practical guidance for compressing networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SQAP-VLA: A Synergistic Quantization-Aware Pruning Framework for High-Performance Vision-Language-Action Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free framework jointly quantizes a VLA model to 4 bits and prunes visual tokens, recovering or exceeding full-precision success rates at 1.93x speedup.

  2. Train-Once Plan-Anywhere Kinodynamic Motion Planning via Diffusion Trees

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A flow-matching policy guides RRT tree expansion, preserving completeness while raising success rates on out-of-distribution kinodynamic planning tasks.

Pith tools