Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning Models May Spuriously Classify Covid-19 from X-ray Images Based on Confounders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.04300 v1 pith:J2CLSBQW submitted 2021-01-08 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords covid-19modelsimagesx-raychestconfoundingdeeplearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Identifying who is infected with the Covid-19 virus is critical for controlling its spread. X-ray machines are widely available worldwide and can quickly provide images that can be used for diagnosis. A number of recent studies claim it may be possible to build highly accurate models, using deep learning, to detect Covid-19 from chest X-ray images. This paper explores the robustness and generalization ability of convolutional neural network models in diagnosing Covid-19 disease from frontal-view (AP/PA), raw chest X-ray images that were lung field cropped. Some concerning observations are made about high performing models that have learned to rely on confounding features related to the data source, rather than the patient's lung pathology, when differentiating between Covid-19 positive and negative labels. Specifically, these models likely made diagnoses based on confounding factors such as patient age or image processing artifacts, rather than medically relevant information.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding Dataset Bias in Medical Imaging: A Case Study on Chest X-rays

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Classifiers can identify the origin of chest X-rays across NIH, CheXpert, MIMIC-CXR, and PadChest with F1 scores up to about 99%, and the bias appears driven mainly by pixel intensity and texture.

Pith tools