Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ELIXIR: Learning from User Feedback on Explanations to Improve Recommender Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.09388 v3 pith:QD2OPJYY submitted 2021-02-15 cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords explanationsuserfeedbackrecommendationselixirframeworkimprovelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

System-provided explanations for recommendations are an important component towards transparent and trustworthy AI. In state-of-the-art research, this is a one-way signal, though, to improve user acceptance. In this paper, we turn the role of explanations around and investigate how they can contribute to enhancing the quality of the generated recommendations themselves. We devise a human-in-the-loop framework, called ELIXIR, where user feedback on explanations is leveraged for pairwise learning of user preferences. ELIXIR leverages feedback on pairs of recommendations and explanations to learn user-specific latent preference vectors, overcoming sparseness by label propagation with item-similarity-based neighborhoods. Our framework is instantiated using generalized graph recommendation via Random Walk with Restart. Insightful experiments with a real user study show significant improvements in movie and book recommendations over item-level feedback.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Addressing Popularity Bias in Third-Party Library Recommendations Using LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Open-source Llama models fail to overcome popularity bias in third-party library recommendations, with low recall across all six tested configurations.

Pith tools