Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Modal Answer Validation for Knowledge-Based VQA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.12248 v3 pith:P6HLQCAN submitted 2021-03-23 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords knowledgeanswermavexexternalfactsknowledge-basedmulti-modalvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of knowledge-based visual question answering involves answering questions that require external knowledge in addition to the content of the image. Such knowledge typically comes in various forms, including visual, textual, and commonsense knowledge. Using more knowledge sources increases the chance of retrieving more irrelevant or noisy facts, making it challenging to comprehend the facts and find the answer. To address this challenge, we propose Multi-modal Answer Validation using External knowledge (MAVEx), where the idea is to validate a set of promising answer candidates based on answer-specific knowledge retrieval. Instead of searching for the answer in a vast collection of often irrelevant facts as most existing approaches do, MAVEx aims to learn how to extract relevant knowledge from noisy sources, which knowledge source to trust for each answer candidate, and how to validate the candidate using that source. Our multi-modal setting is the first to leverage external visual knowledge (images searched using Google), in addition to textual knowledge in the form of Wikipedia sentences and ConceptNet concepts. Our experiments with OK-VQA, a challenging knowledge-based VQA dataset, demonstrate that MAVEx achieves new state-of-the-art results. Our code is available at https://github.com/jialinwu17/MAVEX

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Composing Open-domain Vision with RAG for Ocean Monitoring and Conservation

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using CLIP image embeddings as retrieval keys and LLaVA as the answer generator, the paper reports 84% fish-classification accuracy on the FishNet dataset without domain-specific training.

Pith tools