REVIEW 2 cited by
Representing Numbers in NLP: a Survey and a Vision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
NLP systems rarely give special consideration to numbers found in text. This starkly contrasts with the consensus in neuroscience that, in the brain, numbers are represented differently from words. We arrange recent NLP work on numeracy into a comprehensive taxonomy of tasks and methods. We break down the subjective notion of numeracy into 7 subtasks, arranged along two dimensions: granularity (exact vs approximate) and units (abstract vs grounded). We analyze the myriad representational choices made by 18 previously published number encoders and decoders. We synthesize best practices for representing numbers in text and articulate a vision for holistic numeracy in NLP, comprised of design trade-offs and a unified evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
IGC: Integrating a Gated Calculator into an LLM to Solve Arithmetic Tasks Reliably and Efficiently
A gated calculator module inserted into a frozen Llama 3.1 8B model enables near-perfect arithmetic on BigBench, including multiplication, in a single forward pass without external tools.
-
UncertaintyVis: Preserving Linguistic Uncertainty in Automated Text-to-Chart Generation
A text-to-chart system that visually preserves linguistic hedges helps trained readers match charts to uncertain text, though the cognitive-load evidence is not statistically significant.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.