Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tactile-RL for Insertion: Generalization to Objects of Unknown Geometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.01167 v1 pith:WTLKL4YK submitted 2021-04-02 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords insertionlearningpolicytactileobjectobjectstypeagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Object insertion is a classic contact-rich manipulation task. The task remains challenging, especially when considering general objects of unknown geometry, which significantly limits the ability to understand the contact configuration between the object and the environment. We study the problem of aligning the object and environment with a tactile-based feedback insertion policy. The insertion process is modeled as an episodic policy that iterates between insertion attempts followed by pose corrections. We explore different mechanisms to learn such a policy based on Reinforcement Learning. The key contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that it is possible to learn a tactile insertion policy that generalizes across different object geometries, and an ablation study of the key design choices for the learning agent: 1) the type of learning scheme: supervised vs. reinforcement learning; 2) the type of learning schedule: unguided vs. curriculum learning; 3) the type of sensing modality: force/torque (F/T) vs. tactile; and 4) the type of tactile representation: tactile RGB vs. tactile flow. We show that the optimal configuration of the learning agent (RL + curriculum + tactile flow) exposed to 4 training objects yields an insertion policy that inserts 4 novel objects with over 85.0% success rate and within 3~4 attempts. Comparisons between F/T and tactile sensing, shows that while an F/T-based policy learns more efficiently, a tactile-based policy provides better generalization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PTLD: Sim-to-real Privileged Tactile Latent Distillation for Dexterous Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PTLD distills real privileged tactile data into a state estimator to boost sim-to-real performance of proprioceptive dexterous manipulation policies, yielding 182% improvement on in-hand rotation and 57% on reorientat...

  2. Integrating Model-based Control and RL for Sim2Real Transfer of Tight Insertion Policies

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid policy combining a potential-field controller with residual reinforcement learning, trained only in simulation, achieves high zero-shot success on sub-millimeter insertion tasks in the real world.

Pith tools