Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quality Assurance Challenges for Machine Learning Software Applications During Software Development Life Cycle Phases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.01195 v2 pith:N5ACLXVL submitted 2021-05-03 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords assurancequalitysoftwarechallengesmodelsresearchadoptionlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the past decades, the revolutionary advances of Machine Learning (ML) have shown a rapid adoption of ML models into software systems of diverse types. Such Machine Learning Software Applications (MLSAs) are gaining importance in our daily lives. As such, the Quality Assurance (QA) of MLSAs is of paramount importance. Several research efforts are dedicated to determining the specific challenges we can face while adopting ML models into software systems. However, we are aware of no research that offered a holistic view of the distribution of those ML quality assurance challenges across the various phases of software development life cycles (SDLC). This paper conducts an in-depth literature review of a large volume of research papers that focused on the quality assurance of ML models. We developed a taxonomy of MLSA quality assurance issues by mapping the various ML adoption challenges across different phases of SDLC. We provide recommendations and research opportunities to improve SDLC practices based on the taxonomy. This mapping can help prioritize quality assurance efforts of MLSAs where the adoption of ML models can be considered crucial.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maturity Framework for Enhancing Machine Learning Quality

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A quality score and five-level maturity framework for ML systems, open-sourced and rolled out at Booking.com to track and improve ML quality.

Pith tools