Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multiple Meta-model Quantifying for Medical Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.08913 v2 pith:VIJOUI57 submitted 2021-05-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords medicaldatafeaturesansweringexternallearningmeaningfulmeta-data
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transfer learning is an important step to extract meaningful features and overcome the data limitation in the medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) task. However, most of the existing medical VQA methods rely on external data for transfer learning, while the meta-data within the dataset is not fully utilized. In this paper, we present a new multiple meta-model quantifying method that effectively learns meta-annotation and leverages meaningful features to the medical VQA task. Our proposed method is designed to increase meta-data by auto-annotation, deal with noisy labels, and output meta-models which provide robust features for medical VQA tasks. Extensively experimental results on two public medical VQA datasets show that our approach achieves superior accuracy in comparison with other state-of-the-art methods, while does not require external data to train meta-models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Barriers in Integrating Medical Visual Question Answering into Radiology Workflows: A Scoping Review and Clinicians' Insights

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A scoping review and 50-clinician survey find that MedVQA research is poorly aligned with radiology practice, with mostly non-diagnostic questions, missing patient context, and evaluation metrics that do not measure c...

Pith tools