REVIEW 8 cited by
Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Knowledge distillation (KD), transferring knowledge from a cumbersome teacher model to a lightweight student model, has been investigated to design efficient neural architectures. Generally, the objective function of KD is the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence loss between the softened probability distributions of the teacher model and the student model with the temperature scaling hyperparameter tau. Despite its widespread use, few studies have discussed the influence of such softening on generalization. Here, we theoretically show that the KL divergence loss focuses on the logit matching when tau increases and the label matching when tau goes to 0 and empirically show that the logit matching is positively correlated to performance improvement in general. From this observation, we consider an intuitive KD loss function, the mean squared error (MSE) between the logit vectors, so that the student model can directly learn the logit of the teacher model. The MSE loss outperforms the KL divergence loss, explained by the difference in the penultimate layer representations between the two losses. Furthermore, we show that sequential distillation can improve performance and that KD, particularly when using the KL divergence loss with small tau, mitigates the label noise. The code to reproduce the experiments is publicly available online at https://github.com/jhoon-oh/kd_data/.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments
Selective LLM reformulation guided by high-quality exemplars yields cleaner, more diverse code-review datasets that improve downstream comment generation and code refinement.
-
Leveraging Reward Models for Guiding Code Review Comment Generation
CoRAL fine-tunes a language model with reinforcement learning using reward models derived from comment semantics and code refinement success, and reports improved code review comment quality.
-
Put Teacher in Student's Shoes: Cross-Distillation for Ultra-compact Model Compression Framework
EI-BERT compresses a Chinese NLU model to 1.91 MB with competitive accuracy using attention-based vocabulary pruning, cross-distillation, and module-wise INT8 quantization, and reports deployment at Alipay.
-
Learning an Adaptive and View-Invariant Vision Transformer for Real-Time UAV Tracking
An adaptive block-activation ViT and a mutual-information multi-teacher distillation variant achieve state-of-the-art speed/accuracy trade-offs on six UAV tracking benchmarks.
-
One-Shot Federated Clustering of Non-Independent Completely Distributed Data
GOLD is a one-shot federated clustering framework that finds fine local subclusters, merges their centroids at several granularities on the server, and encodes the multi-granular partitions into an enhanced representa...
-
Compute Can't Handle the Truth: Why Communication Tax Prioritizes Memory and Interconnects in Modern AI Infrastructure
A CXL-based disaggregated memory architecture with hybrid XLink interconnects is proposed and prototyped, claiming large speedups for memory-bound AI and HPC workloads.
-
Efficient Split Learning LSTM Models for FPGA-based Edge IoT Devices
A case study showing how knowledge distillation, pruning, and quantization let a small LSTM run on a low-end FPGA, with three split configurations trading off latency, power, and resource usage.
-
Enhancing CLIP Conceptual Embedding through Knowledge Distillation
Knowledge-CLIP distills Llama 2 embeddings into CLIP and uses k-means soft concept labels to slightly improve CLIP text and image encoder scores on three benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.