Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CoDesc: A Large Code-Description Parallel Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.14220 v1 pith:RWUTMSJG submitted 2021-05-29 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords codecodescdatasetlanguagelargenaturalsearchcode-description
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Translation between natural language and source code can help software development by enabling developers to comprehend, ideate, search, and write computer programs in natural language. Despite growing interest from the industry and the research community, this task is often difficult due to the lack of large standard datasets suitable for training deep neural models, standard noise removal methods, and evaluation benchmarks. This leaves researchers to collect new small-scale datasets, resulting in inconsistencies across published works. In this study, we present CoDesc -- a large parallel dataset composed of 4.2 million Java methods and natural language descriptions. With extensive analysis, we identify and remove prevailing noise patterns from the dataset. We demonstrate the proficiency of CoDesc in two complementary tasks for code-description pairs: code summarization and code search. We show that the dataset helps improve code search by up to 22\% and achieves the new state-of-the-art in code summarization. Furthermore, we show CoDesc's effectiveness in pre-training--fine-tuning setup, opening possibilities in building pretrained language models for Java. To facilitate future research, we release the dataset, a data processing tool, and a benchmark at \url{https://github.com/csebuetnlp/CoDesc}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generation

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro test whether LLMs can first solve a base function and then call it inside a more complex solution, and frontier models lose about 10 to 15 points on this task.

Pith tools