Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary Sentences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.00969 v1 pith:7HX5RTIL submitted 2021-06-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords commonsensereasoningdatasetaccuracybenchmarkabilitycom2sensecomplementary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Commonsense reasoning is intuitive for humans but has been a long-term challenge for artificial intelligence (AI). Recent advancements in pretrained language models have shown promising results on several commonsense benchmark datasets. However, the reliability and comprehensiveness of these benchmarks towards assessing model's commonsense reasoning ability remains unclear. To this end, we introduce a new commonsense reasoning benchmark dataset comprising natural language true/false statements, with each sample paired with its complementary counterpart, resulting in 4k sentence pairs. We propose a pairwise accuracy metric to reliably measure an agent's ability to perform commonsense reasoning over a given situation. The dataset is crowdsourced and enhanced with an adversarial model-in-the-loop setup to incentivize challenging samples. To facilitate a systematic analysis of commonsense capabilities, we design our dataset along the dimensions of knowledge domains, reasoning scenarios and numeracy. Experimental results demonstrate that our strongest baseline (UnifiedQA-3B), after fine-tuning, achieves ~71% standard accuracy and ~51% pairwise accuracy, well below human performance (~95% for both metrics). The dataset is available at https://github.com/PlusLabNLP/Com2Sense.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CryptoX : Compositional Reasoning Evaluation of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark that encodes prompts in secret codes and measures how much accuracy models lose, showing most LLMs, especially open-source ones, struggle on this two-step compositional task.

Pith tools