REVIEW 2 cited by
Energy Consumption of Deep Generative Audio Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In most scientific domains, the deep learning community has largely focused on the quality of deep generative models, resulting in highly accurate and successful solutions. However, this race for quality comes at a tremendous computational cost, which incurs vast energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. At the heart of this problem are the measures that we use as a scientific community to evaluate our work. In this paper, we suggest relying on a multi-objective measure based on Pareto optimality, which takes into account both the quality of the model and its energy consumption. By applying our measure on the current state-of-the-art in generative audio models, we show that it can drastically change the significance of the results. We believe that this type of metric can be widely used by the community to evaluate their work, while putting computational cost -- and in fine energy consumption -- in the spotlight of deep learning research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diffused Responsibility: Analyzing the Energy Consumption of Generative Text-to-Audio Diffusion Models
Inference energy of seven text-to-audio diffusion models grows linearly with denoising steps, while quality saturates, so the best quality-per-energy settings use 10 to 50 steps.
-
Detecting Musical Deepfakes
On the FakeMusicCaps benchmark, an ImageNet-pretrained ResNet18 trained on mel spectrograms distinguishes human from AI-generated music with about 88% F1, and stays above 80% F1 on clips with pitch and tempo changes, ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.