REVIEW 2 cited by
Joint Shapley values: a measure of joint feature importance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The Shapley value is one of the most widely used measures of feature importance partly as it measures a feature's average effect on a model's prediction. We introduce joint Shapley values, which directly extend Shapley's axioms and intuitions: joint Shapley values measure a set of features' average contribution to a model's prediction. We prove the uniqueness of joint Shapley values, for any order of explanation. Results for games show that joint Shapley values present different insights from existing interaction indices, which assess the effect of a feature within a set of features. The joint Shapley values provide intuitive results in ML attribution problems. With binary features, we present a presence-adjusted global value that is more consistent with local intuitions than the usual approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Saliency Methods are Encoders: Analysing Logical Relations Towards Interpretation
On synthetic AND/OR/XOR tasks, saliency methods frequently rank irrelevant baseline inputs above logically relevant ones, and retrained models can recover class information from masked inputs, indicating that score or...
-
Saliency Maps are Ambiguous: Analysis of Logical Relations on First and Second Order Attributions
On synthetic AND/OR/XOR datasets with perfectly accurate models, every tested saliency method sometimes ranks a truly irrelevant input above a necessary one, so the scores cannot be trusted as relevance rankings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.