REVIEW 1 cited by
Q-Pain: A Question Answering Dataset to Measure Social Bias in Pain Management
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP), and specifically automated Question Answering (QA) systems, have demonstrated both impressive linguistic fluency and a pernicious tendency to reflect social biases. In this study, we introduce Q-Pain, a dataset for assessing bias in medical QA in the context of pain management, one of the most challenging forms of clinical decision-making. Along with the dataset, we propose a new, rigorous framework, including a sample experimental design, to measure the potential biases present when making treatment decisions. We demonstrate its use by assessing two reference Question-Answering systems, GPT-2 and GPT-3, and find statistically significant differences in treatment between intersectional race-gender subgroups, thus reaffirming the risks posed by AI in medical settings, and the need for datasets like ours to ensure safety before medical AI applications are deployed.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BioClinical ModernBERT: A State-of-the-Art Long-Context Encoder for Biomedical and Clinical NLP
A continued-pretrained ModernBERT encoder for biomedical and clinical text claims SOTA on several clinical NLP tasks, with caveats about data overlap between pretraining and evaluation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.