Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DeepEdgeBench: Benchmarking Deep Neural Networks on Edge Devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.09457 v1 pith:HNGH74XW submitted 2021-08-21 cs.AI cs.DC

classification cs.AIcs.DC
keywords devicesedgepowertimeconsumptioninferencenanocomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

EdgeAI (Edge computing based Artificial Intelligence) has been most actively researched for the last few years to handle variety of massively distributed AI applications to meet up the strict latency requirements. Meanwhile, many companies have released edge devices with smaller form factors (low power consumption and limited resources) like the popular Raspberry Pi and Nvidia's Jetson Nano for acting as compute nodes at the edge computing environments. Although the edge devices are limited in terms of computing power and hardware resources, they are powered by accelerators to enhance their performance behavior. Therefore, it is interesting to see how AI-based Deep Neural Networks perform on such devices with limited resources. In this work, we present and compare the performance in terms of inference time and power consumption of the four Systems on a Chip (SoCs): Asus Tinker Edge R, Raspberry Pi 4, Google Coral Dev Board, Nvidia Jetson Nano, and one microcontroller: Arduino Nano 33 BLE, on different deep learning models and frameworks. We also provide a method for measuring power consumption, inference time and accuracy for the devices, which can be easily extended to other devices. Our results showcase that, for Tensorflow based quantized model, the Google Coral Dev Board delivers the best performance, both for inference time and power consumption. For a low fraction of inference computation time, i.e. less than 29.3% of the time for MobileNetV2, the Jetson Nano performs faster than the other devices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Performance Analysis of You Only Look Once Models for Deployment on Constrained Computational Edge Devices in Drone Applications

    cs.DC 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    INT8-quantized YOLOv8n on the Jetson Orin NX reaches about 66 FPS, making it the fastest tested configuration for drone-side detection, while the Raspberry Pi 5 stays below real-time rates.

  2. Edge AI Deployment Beyond Models: A BSP-Aware Systems Framework for Industrial Embedded Platforms

    cs.DC 2026-04 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A white paper proposing a five-layer, gated deployment framework for industrial Edge AI that prioritizes BSP and platform validation before model integration.

Pith tools