REVIEW 2 cited by
CodeQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Source Code Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose CodeQA, a free-form question answering dataset for the purpose of source code comprehension: given a code snippet and a question, a textual answer is required to be generated. CodeQA contains a Java dataset with 119,778 question-answer pairs and a Python dataset with 70,085 question-answer pairs. To obtain natural and faithful questions and answers, we implement syntactic rules and semantic analysis to transform code comments into question-answer pairs. We present the construction process and conduct systematic analysis of our dataset. Experiment results achieved by several neural baselines on our dataset are shown and discussed. While research on question-answering and machine reading comprehension develops rapidly, few prior work has drawn attention to code question answering. This new dataset can serve as a useful research benchmark for source code comprehension.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CodeRepoQA: A Large-scale Benchmark for Software Engineering Question Answering
The paper presents CodeRepoQA, a large-scale multi-turn repository-level QA benchmark, and evaluates ten LLMs on it.
-
A Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Fine-Grained Issue Solving Capabilities of Large Language Models
FAUN-Eval is a curated benchmark of 300 real GitHub issue-PR pairs that scores LLMs separately on question answering, fault localization, and code editing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.