Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Active Linear Regression for $\ell_p$ Norms and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.04888 v4 pith:3AIORTHW submitted 2021-11-09 cs.LG cs.DSstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.DSstat.ML
keywords epsilonregressiontildeactiveboundsinftylossnorm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study active sampling algorithms for linear regression, which aim to query only a few entries of a target vector $b\in\mathbb R^n$ and output a near minimizer to $\min_{x\in\mathbb R^d} \|Ax-b\|$, for a design matrix $A\in\mathbb R^{n \times d}$ and loss $\|\cdot\|$. For $p$ norm regression for any $0<p<\infty$, we give an algorithm based on Lewis weight sampling outputting a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate solution using just $\tilde O(d/\epsilon^2)$ queries to $b$ for $p\in(0,1)$, $\tilde{O}(d/\epsilon)$ queries for $1<p<2$, and $\tilde{O}(d^{p/2}/\epsilon^p)$ queries for $2<p<\infty$. For $0<p<2$, our bounds are optimal up to log factors, settling the query complexity for this range. For $2<p<\infty$, our dependence on $d$ is optimal, while our dependence on $\epsilon$ is off by at most $\epsilon$, up to log factors. Our result resolves an open question of [CD21], who gave near optimal bounds for the $1$ norm, but required $d^2/\epsilon^2$ samples for $\ell_p$ regression with $1<p<2$, and gave no bounds for $2<p<\infty$ or $0<p<1$. We also give the first total sensitivity bound of $O(d^{\max\{1,p/2\}}\log^2n)$ for loss functions of degree $p$ polynomial growth, improving a result of [TMF20]. By combining this with our techniques for $\ell_p$ regression, we obtain an active regression algorithm making $\tilde O(d^{1+\max\{1,p/2\}}/\mathrm{poly}(\epsilon))$ queries for such loss functions, including the Tukey and Huber losses, answering another question of [CD21]. For the Huber loss, we further improve our bound to $\tilde O(d^{4-2\sqrt2}/\mathrm{poly}(\epsilon))$ samples. Our sensitivity bounds also have many applications, including Orlicz norm subspace embeddings, robust subspace approximation, and dimension reduction for smoothed $p$-norms. Finally, our active sampling results give the first sublinear time algorithms for Kronecker product regression under every $p$ norm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Robust Cross Domain Alignment

    stat.ML 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three robust variants of Gromov-Wasserstein (Tukey and Huber GW, locally robust GW, and a robust reversible Gromov-Monge distance) are introduced, with partial theoretical guarantees and empirical gains on contaminate...

Pith tools