REVIEW 2 cited by
Deep Hedging: Learning to Remove the Drift under Trading Frictions with Minimal Equivalent Near-Martingale Measures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a machine learning approach for finding minimal equivalent martingale measures for markets simulators of tradable instruments, e.g. for a spot price and options written on the same underlying. We extend our results to markets with frictions, in which case we find "near-martingale measures" under which the prices of hedging instruments are martingales within their bid/ask spread. By removing the drift, we are then able to learn using Deep Hedging a "clean" hedge for an exotic payoff which is not polluted by the trading strategy trying to make money from statistical arbitrage opportunities. We correspondingly highlight the robustness of this hedge vs estimation error of the original market simulator. We discuss applications to two market simulators.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning with Expected Signatures: Theory and Applications
The paper proves consistency and asymptotic normality for empirical expected signature estimators under irregular and dependent sampling and proposes a martingale correction that lowers estimator variance.
-
Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learning with Itakura-Saito Loss
The Itakura-Saito loss, derived from Bregman divergence, learns risk-averse value functions that match the exponential-utility Bellman equations and trains more stably than exponential MSE in the tested benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.