Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Formal Analysis of Art: Proxy Learning of Visual Concepts from Style Through Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.01819 v1 pith:NX47OMOV submitted 2022-01-05 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV
keywords visualproxyconceptslearninggenerallanguagemodelspaintings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a machine learning system that can quantify fine art paintings with a set of visual elements and principles of art. This formal analysis is fundamental for understanding art, but developing such a system is challenging. Paintings have high visual complexities, but it is also difficult to collect enough training data with direct labels. To resolve these practical limitations, we introduce a novel mechanism, called proxy learning, which learns visual concepts in paintings though their general relation to styles. This framework does not require any visual annotation, but only uses style labels and a general relationship between visual concepts and style. In this paper, we propose a novel proxy model and reformulate four pre-existing methods in the context of proxy learning. Through quantitative and qualitative comparison, we evaluate these methods and compare their effectiveness in quantifying the artistic visual concepts, where the general relationship is estimated by language models; GloVe or BERT. The language modeling is a practical and scalable solution requiring no labeling, but it is inevitably imperfect. We demonstrate how the new proxy model is robust to the imperfection, while the other models are sensitively affected by it.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal LLMs Can Reason about Aesthetics in Zero-Shot

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A zero-shot two-stage prompting baseline (ArtCoT) makes multimodal LLMs' aesthetic judgments align substantially better with human expert rankings in pairwise artwork comparisons.

Pith tools